您现在的位置: 中国美术家 >> 艺术新闻 >> 展览信息 >> 另类其他展览 >> 正文   
[组图]“NONO”11个艺术家自主策划的最新作品展         ★★★
“NONO”11个艺术家自主策划的最新作品展
            
 作者:未知 
点击:
文章来源:网友提供 发布时间:2007-4-23 21:06:34
【字体:

·展览城市:北京-北京

·展览时间:2007-04-22~2007-06-17

·开幕酒会: 2007-04-22 15:00

·展览地点:长征空间

·联系方式: 010-64387107

·备注:

  展览前言:

  NONO是重复的拒绝和反对, 还是对拒绝的反对? 到底是说不还是不说不? 真实地呈现了当代艺术的小题大做和大题小做的矛盾。虽然无策展人, 无主题, 但还是从各自的角度紧密地和对现实的态度有所联系。 在这样一个注重策展人话语权的时代,策展人的缺失毋宁说是某种残缺或另类的张扬。相对于一些有名无实的策展行为,拒绝策展人参与是一种赤裸的真实和试验。他们自耕自种、自我造局,展览本身是自发、自主、自然而然的,是切磋过招,也是集体游戏。艺术家们对这次共同亮相是有某种共识的,这种共识的前提是能够玩到一起的相互关联。可以夸大为源自形而上的艺术理想,亦或只是简单的形而下的生活经验。这里是一个事实呈现,被自主包裹的艺术聪慧,被自由困住的艺术真诚。中国当代艺术幻象中的沼泽和自救,艺术和艺术家的“瓶颈”是假设演习还是危机面临?当代艺术家的社会理想主义情怀能在多大程度上得到回应?是双向选择还是一厢情愿?所有的困惑、矛盾所指向的是当代艺术生态还是艺术家本身, 抑或是 “展览” 这个问题的现场?

  Is NONO a double refusal and rejection, or is it the rejection of refusal? Is it saying no, or not saying no? Perhaps the phrase accurately presents the current contradiction in contemporary art, both large and small. The exhibition, curatorless and themeless, is nonetheless linked with each artist’s personal perspective and their attitude towards the contemporary. In a period accustomed to the enfeebled iscourse of the curator, is the lack of a curator an inadequacy or a new type of artistic flamboyance? In contrast to naming a curator for the sake of having a curator, the act of refusing a curator is a direct and raw reality and experiment. The artist’s have done it all DIY, the exhibition itself is spontaneous, autonomous and naturally occurring exchange of experiences as well as a collective game. There is a consensus among the artists, one that is premised upon the ability to amuse one another. One can conflate it to a metaphysical artistic ideal, or a mundane and profane experience. This is a presentation of this reality, a self-referential packaging of artistic intelligence, and an artistic sincerity restricted by its own freedom. Is there an illusion of swampy marshes from which contemporary Chinese artists must rescue themselves? Is a “bottle neck” among art and artists a hypothetical exercise, or a sign of imminent disaster? To what degree can an artist’s social idealism incite response? Can the work be engaging, or will it merely exist as the artist’s self-delusion? Do these conflicting realities point at a deficiency in the practice of contemporary art, or in the artists themselves; or perhaps it is the “exhibition” which is the site of the problem?

参展艺术家: 储云、何岸、蒋志、阚萱、刘韡、石青、秦思源、王卫、徐震、杨振中、朱昱

Artists: Chu Yun, He An, Jiang Zhi, Kan Xuan, Liu Wei, Shi Qing, Colin Chinnery, Wang Wei, Xu Zhen, Yang Zhenzhong, and Zhu Yu.

阚萱《2元!2元!》 影像

[1] [2] [3] 下一页

新闻录入:sea.zy    责任编辑:林昕 
  • 上一篇新闻:

  • 下一篇新闻:
  •   最新热点
      最新推荐
      相关新闻
    《忽左忽右》-当代艺术作品…
    宋庄:一个中国当代艺术的神…
    香港举办美国西部当代艺术展
    红——三尚周年庆展览
    三尚当代艺术收藏展
    “北京制造”当代艺术展
    佳士得「战后及当代艺术」拍…
    当代艺术存在市场风险 泡沫…
    2007香港国际当代艺术博览会…
    上海艺术博览会国际当代艺术…
      评论:(显示最新10条。以下只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!) 发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口

    有一些文章内容由网友自主提供,不代表本站观点,如果有问题请及时通知我们! 联系邮箱webmaster@artist.org.cn 24小时内我们定当处理!谢谢合作!
    | 设为首页 | 加入收藏 | 收藏到QQ/TM | 总编信箱 | 申请链接 | 关于我们 | 邮箱登陆 | 合作伙伴 | 投稿专区 | 站点地图 |
    版权所有:2004-2007 中国美术家(www.artist.org.cn)
    通用网址:中国美术家
    中文域名:中国美术家.中国 中国美术家.cn
    Http://www.artist.org.cn(Http://www.china-meishujia.com) Email :infoartist.org.cn  webmasterartist.org.cn 苏ICP备05063933号